Facultatea de Jurnalism Cluj-Napoca (1)

O formulare corecta ar fi Facultatea de Stiinte Politice, Administrative si ale Comunicarii din cadrul Universitatii Babes-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca, insa in popor se spune „Facultatea de Jurnalism/Jurnalisitica/Jurna”. Intamplator, sunt „mandrul” posesor al unei diplome emise de aceasta entitate, iar singurul, dar absolut singurul lucru bun in aceasta chestiune este faptul ca „da bine” fata de restul lumii. Nu ca as fi ascultat vreodata de „gura lumii”, dar arata ok pe un C.V. asta in cazul in care angajatorul nu stie ca de fapt Jurnalismul e o facultate de 2 lei…
Cu toate ca in linii mari si parintii mei proletari au spus acelasi lucru, am insistat sa imi urmaresc visul, mai ales dupa ce la insistentele acelorasi parinti am facut patru ani de Economic in loc de un liceu cu profil uman, asa cum mi-as fi dorit. Pana la urma am ajuns sa am de-a face tot cu firme, contabilitate si alte chestii carora nu le-am acordat importanta la vremea aceea, insa asta este cu totul alta poveste, pe care o voi relata pe viitor 🙂

Revenind la FSPAC (fas-pac :P) trebuie sa mentionez ca nu stiu cum stau lucrurile in prezent, insa cu certitudine in perioada 2003-2007 era dezastru, din toate punctele de vedere… Cel mai grav nu era insa faptul ca taxele de scolarizare nu era justificate de calitatea serviciilor de educatie oferite (de exemplu la Atelierul TV se preda teorie, fiind foarte rare cazurile in care VCR-ul din anii 90 chiar functiona, Atelierul Radio functiona dupa acelasi principiu, practica se facea dupa modelul: „Mergeti si gasiti-va!”, iar toata lumea venea cu adeverinte stampilate si semnate fara a fi calcat o zi prin redactia respectiva etc) ci personajele care formau urmatorii jurnalisti ai tarii. Seful de catedra, Ilie Rad, este cel mai bun exemplu al omului cocotat in functii inalte, fara a avea pregatirea necesara pentru aceasta. Despre el mai multe intr-un articol dedicat domniei sale, acesta este insa despre colegii mei de promotie.

Am cunoscut in timpul facultatii si oameni de caracter, atat din randul profesorilor cat si al colegilor, dar adevarul trist este ca 90% din absolventii acestei specializari habar nu aveau cu ce se mananca aceasta meserie, iar o buna parte dintre ei nu ar putea sa scrie nici macar o stire dupa patru ani de invatamant „superior”, iar despre coloana vertebrala si principii stimabilii afisau o ignoranta sora cu prostia crasa.

De ce spun asta? Cel mai bun exemplu il reprezinta un incident petrecut in ultimul an de studiu, 2007, inainte de Licenta, cand pentru un semestru intreg am urmat un curs intitulat „Politici Publice” predat de un profesor american, Emery Dalesio. Acesta facea parte dintr-un program de schimb de experienta or something (ca sa vorbim pe limba omului) si isi desfasura activitatea exclusiv in limba engleza. Problema domniei sale a fost ca se comporta dupa modelul clasic al imperialistului, notarea si evaluarea se facea dupa sistemul american, da-l dracului de contract de studiu semnat de noi cu Facultatea. Rezultatul a fost ca aproape 3 sferturi dintre studenti au picat examenul, insa problemele au aparut cu ocazia reevaluarii, care, dupa normele universitare, avea loc la o saptamana dupa primul examen. Din motive subiective insa, acest profesoras a preferat sa acorde restantierilor cea de-a doua sansa la cateva zile dupa prima examinare, iar in unele cazuri studentii nu stiau nici in dimineata reevaluarii daca au picat sau nu primul examen.

Sa lasam corespondenta mea cu Dalesio sa vorbeasca de la sine, iar ca sa fac totul mai usor de urmarit, voi marca cu albastru textul scris de mine si cu rosu pe al iubitorului de hamburgeri (da, sunt rau si unfair, sue me!):

Grading on all assignments is not complete.

It appears you will pass.

Your score for homework and in class quizzes was 56 points with the final World Bank quiz yet to grade. There were 150 points for homework and quizzes, half the total of 300 points in the course.

56 points + 76 points for the final = 132 with the final project not yet graded.

It takes 150 points to pass.

From: Adi Balan
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 12:04 AM
To: Emery Dalesio
Subject: Re: final exam graded

Yes, but i don’t know how many points i have in total. Did i pass the course or not?

Dupa inca o zi, joi, chiar inainte de examen, primesc raspunsul acesta:

In Emery Dalesio’s business news reporting course, you have received the following grades.

Extra credit work on following a company’s stock has not been graded yet. If you did one of these assignments, your grade will be higher:

Final exam (out of 100 points): 76

Final project (out of 50 points):

(Final project assignments delivered by the deadline on email have not yet been graded.)

Total points (out of 300 points): 132

150 points were needed to pass the course.

The final exam will be given one last time TOMORROW, Friday, 9 Feb. 16:00 – 18:00 in Sala II/4

I understand what you are saying, but consider that you are putting me in a very difficult position here: there are a few more hours until the reexamination and i still don’t know if i passed the course or not. You said in a previous email that „it appears i will pass”, but that answer is a presumtion, not a statement. With respect, i inform you that never before have i been put in a similar situation by a teacher.

Adrian Balan

And I am sure few of your teachers actually asked you to work for your grades from one week to the next. There are a lot of zero grades for homework assignments that are causing the problems you are having now. That was your choice, not mine.

With respect, I inform you that your grade on the final project is 10 out of the maximum 50 points. This is in line with other members of the class who did not write an article that focused on the entire point of the project:

The project, once again, was:
1. find someone willing to talk about the greatest mistake of their business career; 2. get them to explain it with details and write a good story about it, 3. get the person to explain what they have done to avoid the mistake in the future.

I tried to make clear several times that this project was not about writing a profile of a person or their business. It was to get them to discuss their mistake. This is why I devoted a very easy homework assignment in November to check to make sure students were actually investigating busines people who would discuss their mistake.

I also offered students the opportunity to turn in the project before the deadline for me to review, edit and discuss with the student. Several students took advantage of the opportunity and avoided making a mistake.

You wrote a profile of a friend who started an internet portal only a short time ago and who has nothing to say except he has had disagreements with his associate.

If you are in a bad position right now, it is because you did not tend to your work the way many of your colleages did.

Unless you wrote an extra credit study of a company’s stock performance that I have not yet read, whether or not you pass the course depends on getting a better score on tomorrow;s retest.

I am sorry i have to disagree with your logic. The fact that i am a good student or not, that i did many of the homework assignments or not, is irrelevant: I still deserve a fair chance of reexamination. What you did denies that. I did not receive your mail until this morning because it was sent in the bulk folder. Anyway, even if it arrived last night it wouldn’t make a difference. Now i have only 7 hours to prepare myself for the exam? This is ridiculous, and never been done before, and don’t try to blame me for this. I should have known a week ago that i did not pass the test, not a few hours before the reexamination. I suggest you read the internal policy of the faculty and see what it says there about this. And about the final project: i think i met the required criteria of the assignement. I answered all your questions and that is the way it also looks in a newspaper if it is published. I really think i deserve more that just 10 points. All i wrote, i wrote from notes taken when i spoke to him about his business, which by the way, the fact that is just started is also irrelevant, as the fact he is my friend. So, because i transformed direct speach into indirrect speach it appear „he didn’t say much”. Like „it appears i will pass” transformed into what you wrote earlier. If i hadn’t mailed you, i probably wouldn’t know by this time, right? And as a technicality, the fact that you teach, assing homework, and examine us in english makes your course very problematic. You see, we signed the contract with the faculty for study in romanian language, not hungarian, german or english. The fact that i know english is irrelevant. Anyway, i won’t get into that right now. What i am saying is that you did not know much about the romanian system (reexamination dates, actual grades from 1 to 10 etc) and is possible you have commited a mistake here too. I am to understand that now i have 142 points out of the needed 150 and i failed. This so called reexamination will erase all of my work until now so, it would have been a lot easier if i just attended this. So ALL before this is null and void? And it all depends now on a test i haven;t had time to prepare myself for, thinking that „it appears i will pass”. This is not fair. This is something the communists would have done. Please show you come from a country with more respect for the rights of the individual and adress this problem. If this does not happen, i will take the necessary legal steps.
                                                              Adrian Balan

Adi,

You make many points that are reasonable. You have some legitimate complaints. I did not ask for the class I was given.  I will be happy to discuss your complaints after today’s re-examination.

The dates of the exams were set after discussion with your colleages attending the lectures. The problem of the re-examination date was set in the same way. The fact is that I am leaving for Bucharest next week and the date for the re-examination was originally to be tomorrow. The faculty required the date to be changed because all the halls were being used by courses that meet only on the weekend.

I have used objective measures all semester and I can easily justify the marks I have given you or any other student. You should pursue every option available to you to make sure that your rights were respected.

It is true that I have been kept ignorant of a great deal of how the Romanian education system runs. I have also made it clear to anyone there to hear it that I was sent here to do some things differently.

I am very sorry about the language distance between us, but I was sent here with the understanding that all my instruction would be in English. That was a fact clearly understood by the journalism department.

Again, you made the decision how much to take part in the course and how you would be graded. My country also places a very high value on personal responsibility, and I am holding you accountable for your choices now.

As to your objections about your score on the final project, please see the directions I gave below.

As I said in lecture many times, we are all supposed to be journalists of one kind or another. Journalists ask questions. You are also accountable for failing to ask questions if something was unclear.

details of the FINAL PROJECT assignment
    For this project, you should find a business man or woman who works for someone else or an entrepreneur who works for himself.  Your mission is to get them to tell a story that answers two questions:
1.    What was your greatest mistake in business?
2.    What do you do differently now to avoid it based on what you learned from that experience?
The story you write should give full background on the person, his name, age, where he went to university (if he did), where he was born or grew up, details on his business career so far, like where he has worked.

The story should also include descriptions about his current company including:
1.    Annual profit or revenue 
2.    The initial amount of capital used to start the company
3.    What exactly the company does. Who are their customers and who are their main competitors?

I have had very encouraging conversations with editors that they would be willing to publish some of the best stories collected by reporters in our class.

You should tell the person you interview that your story MAY be published by a Romanian publication.  I am not telling you the name of the publication because its editor does not want its name used by reporters who don’t work for the publication and are not accountable for their conduct.

Tell the business person that you must collect a telephone number where this person can be reached a few weeks or a few months from now.  If your story is selected as one of the best candidates for publication, an editor from the newspaper or magazine will call to make sure the details in the story are accurate. 

Drept urmare, in ziua examenului, eu si un coleg care nu numai ca imi impartasea spiritul justitiar insa avea si curajul de a actiona, este vorba aici de Florin Bretotean, am realizat o lista de cereri pe care urma sa le inmanam decanului, insa inainte de aceasta am hotarat sa incercam a discuta si a ajunge la o intelegere cu Dalesio, iar in caz contrar sa parasim sala de examen. Se pare ca Florin publicase pe grupul online al „jurnalistilor” si schimbul de mailuri dintre mine si Dalesio, iar popularitatea mea crescuse simtitor 😛

grupjurna

Am intrat cu totii in sala de curs, iar eu si Florin am incercat sa ne punem planul in aplicare. Am fost ignorati cu desavarsire de catre american, care s-a dus direct la catedra, de unde a ordonat ceva de genul:

„Take your seats and draw a piece of paper!

In momentul acela, in timp ce toti colegii s-au conformat, iar mica noastra revolutie parea innabusita in fasa, m-am dus direct in fata salii si am vorbit cu profesorul american, repetand cererile noastre de bun simt.

„Take it up with your university, not me”,  a fost replica domniei sale.

„You sit at this desk now, you represent the university here and now”

A fost totusi in zadar, asa ca am luat decizia:

„I will not sit here and tolerate this masquarade of an exam!” si m-am indreptat sub privirile tuturor spre locul meu, mi-am luat mapa si am plecat. Spre bucuria mea, toti, cu exceptia a una sau doua persoane, s-au ridicat si m-au urmat. Pentru cateva clipe am fost si eu un Miron Cozma al intelectualilor, un revolutionar in dreptul sau 🙂

Petitia de care pomeneam mai sus a fost semnata de mai multi colegi, iar spre cinstea lor, chiar si de unii care isi luasera examenul. De partea cealalta, au fost si 1-2 care au insistat sa isi stearga numele de pe lista, „pentru a nu avea probleme”. Felicitari tuturor celorlalti pentru demnitatea de care au dat dovada:

petitie

semnaturi (2)

Pasul urmator a fost sa ii trimit lui Ilie Rad urmatorul email:

Buna ziua,
Doresc sa va atrag atentia asupra unei probleme aparute la cursul „Politici si afaceri publice”. Probabil ati fost informat cu privire la programarea restantei la acest curs in timpul sesiunii de examene, si nu in cea de restante. Mai mult, la numai o zi dupa a doua data de examen, majoritatea studentilor afland prea tarziu (sau chiar deloc) daca au promovat sau nu cursul. In acest caz, lipsa timpului de pregatire pentru restanta, precum si faptul ca doar promovarea reexaminarii nu asigura promovarea cursului (datorita sistemului cel putin neobisnuit al domnului Emery Dalesio) m-au facut pe mine si majoritatea colegilor mei sa nu recunoasteam validitatea asa-zisului examen de restanta din data de 9 februarie si sa refuzam a lua parte la acesta. Avand in vedere faptul ca a fost incalcat regulamentul universitatii, cat si cel al facultatii, va rog sa-mi comunicati o ora la care pot sa va gasesc la facultate pentru a gasi cat mai repede o solutie la aceasta problema.

                                                   Cu respect, 
                                                   Adrian Balan student sectia jurnalism, anul IV

Zilele urmatoare, eu si Florin Bretotean am mers intr-o audienta la „marele” Ilie Rad, care ne-a intampinat tot un zambet, iar primele sale cuvinte, rostite pe un ton mieros, au fost: „Va multumesc foarte mult ca nu ati mers la presa prima data!” Noi nu am fost la presa, insa presa a venit la noi, Ziarul Clujeanului publicand un articol despre eveniment, (articol care a aparut atat pe printt, cat si in mediul online)

protestejurna

iar noi in calitate de lideri ai protestului am fost contactati telefonic pentru a da o scurta declaratie, ceea ce am si facut. In cele din urma, totul a ajuns si in presa nationala (http://www.romanialibera.ro/actualitate/locale/a-doua-licenta-cu-cantec-la-jurnalism-cluj-98214.html). Tonul si expresia fetei sefului de catedra s-a schimbat imediat dupa aflarea acestui lucru, iar discutiile au ajuns intr-un punct mort. Pe deasupra, dupa ce am plecat din biroul sau, acest dinozaur margaiscian (jurnalistii astia, cate expresii pot inventa, asa-i?) a considerat de cuviinta sa incerce sa ma si intimideze trimitandu-mi urmatorul email:

Adrian,

Imi pare nespus de rau d emodul in care a reactionat
anul vostru la problema aparuta cu profesorul
american. Situatia este foarte delicat pentru noi.
Trebuiie sa stii ca am facut eforturi mari ca sa aduc
un bursier Fulbright la catedra. Iti dai seama ca el
va face un raport la fundatia care i-a dat banii si va
vorbi despre acest incident. Imi vine greu sa cred ca
partea americana va mai trimite bursieri la noi. Ceea
ce este o pierdere pentru viitorii studenti.
Dar, desigur, voi sunteti liberi sa scrieti ce
doriti.Ar fi bine insa, de fiecare data, sa va ganditi
si la consecinte. Poate ar trebui sa reflectati la
cele intamplate anul trecut.
Solutia propusa este urmatoarea: in timpul sesiunii
legale d erestante, cineva de la catedra va va da
subiectul propus de Emery, noi ii vom trimite
lucrarile la Bucuresti, iar el le va corecta. Punctele
obtinute de voi vir fi transformate in note si trecute
in catalog. Solutia a fost adoptata in acord cu domnul
decan Catalin Baba.
Daca sunt probleme in continuare, putem dialoga.
Ilie Rad

Ca fapt divers, oare nu ar trebui ca un Sef de Catedra la Jurnalism, sau mai pompos Stiinte Politice, Administrative si ale Comunicarii, sa se exprime mai ingrijit, cu mai putine greseli, chiar daca este vorba doar de un email?

Povestea e mult mai complicata, iar Ilie Rad in mod clar ramasese cu sechele dupa evenimentele anului precedent, cand un grup de studenti, condusi de un alt Adrian, de data aceasta pe numele sau Dohotaru, au protestat in fata facultatii datorita nenumaratelor nereguli, ceea ce a facut deliciul intregii mass-media:

http://www.didactic.ro/stiri/8000_conflict-la-universitatea-babes-bolyai

In mailul sau, acest individ a strecurat insa si o amenintare cat se poate de serioasa, facand o aluzie mai mult sau mai putin subtila la faptul ca voi sustine examenul de licenta in acea vara, iar el, evident, va face parte din comisie, impreuna cu acolita sa, Mihaela Muresan, iar notarea se va face tot ca in anul trecut, cand cei care au indraznit sa isi ceara drepturile au fost „penalizati”.

Ei, ce bine ca nu am pus niciodata pret pe note:

Domnule Ilie Rad,
   Si mie imi pare nespus de rau ca s-a ajuns in situatia aceasta, pentru care singurul responsabil pare a fi domnul Emery Dalesio. Sper ca acesta ne va comunica totusi data si ora la care va avea loc reexaminarea. In ceea ce priveste presa, v-am repetat si la ultima noastra intalnire faptul ca nu am influentat in nici un fel aparitia articolului, decat am raspuns la intrebarile reporterului, care a vrut decat sa confirme pozitia studentilor. Sper ca intelegeti faptul ca daca am fi dorit un scandal mediatic, nu am fi apelat numai la Ziarul Clujeanului si nu am fi asteptat atata timp pana a aparut problema cu Dalesio, existand o multime de alte nereguli in cadrul facultatii. Nu o sa intru acum in detalii, nu acesta a fost scopul meu si al colegilor. Daca considerati ca articolul respectiv aduce prejudicii facultatii sau dumneavostra, aveti la indemana caile legale de atac, care, din cate am invatat in timpul cat am activat in presa, vizeaza redactorul respectiv, nu toti colegii de an ai acestuia. Si la ce din cele intamplate anul trecut ar trebui sa reflectam mai exact?
           
                                                                                Adrian Balan

Nesimtirea suprema in actiune:

As vrea stiu la ce te refri cand spui „o multime de
alte nereguli din facultate”. Cred ca ar trebui sa
stiu de ele, ca sef de catedra, nu?
In ce priveste reflectiile la adresa stduentilor de
anul trecut, era o simpla sugestie, fara relevanta.
Pentru detaliile legate de examen, va rog sa tineti
lagatura cu domnisoara Andreea Mogos.
Ilie Rad

In cele din urma, problema cu reexaminarea s-a rezolvat, iar din cele de mai jos se vede cine era adevaratul vinovat. Il judecasem prea aspru pe Emery Dalesio, care credea cu sinceritate ca isi facuse datoria, dupa ce Rad nu se obosise sa-i dea nici cea mai mica explicatie cu privire la modul in care functioneaza sistemul romanesc de invatamant si regulamentul UBB:

Mr. Dalesio,
I have just read your email posted on the journalism group. Please note, that not even half of us are members of the group, and for a detailed information, please send a mass email. You stated that the reexamination counts as 100 out of 300 points. This again, violates the faculty’s internal rules. A reexamination means that a student can pass the course on reexamination alone, without taking into consideration class activity or assignments. This is not at the latitude of the teacher, it is a fact. I too, consider that the work (not that much and not so much to your liking as it appeared) i did during the semester should count for something, but passing the course should not be linked to that. You could give extra points to a paper because of the class activity and homeworks if that is what you want, but a student who gets 50 points (equals a grade of  5) at the reexamination should be passed on that alone. If you remember, i tried to explain the situation to you the last time, but to no good then. Please let’s get this over with in a way that is satisfactory for all the parties involved. I don’t know if you were briefed or not by the faculty regarding the Romanian system, but the fact is we sure don’t need things like this happening prior to the licence. I really thought we had streightend things out and that Rad explained you ALL the aspects of the problem. Also, the link about poland doesn’t work for a week, so any questions from that topic would disadvantage us greatly. It takes great character to admit one did a mistake, something most of your Romanian counterparts would never do. I appreciate that and i would ask you please take note of my observations.
                                                                            With respect, 
                                                                            Adrian Balan

Adi,

As your colleagues may have told you, I am being told that grades should be rounded up. If that is true, I think you will be among the students who will benefit.

If you are correct in all you say, then Prof. Rad did not explain everything.

In fact, the discussion Prof. Rad and I had with the Decanant, whose name I forget, supported my view that the re-examination should not overwhelm my principle that students should learn journalism by actually practicing it over time.  They agreed that passing the re-examination does not translate automatically into passing the course.

I respect that you may be correct.  Please enforce your rights with Prof. Rad. 

I do not begrudge you protecting your interests and rights. 

I hope you will not begrudge the fact that I was told certain things about how I could teach a course that I invested a tremendous amount of work into, and that I planned several months of my life based on statements that may have been false from the start.

If you are correct, I will have to consider what to do and whether it changes my willingness to continue working on the duties of this course beyond my time in Cluj.

Emery Dalesio

Dupa ce a trecut si Licenta, unde singura greseala pe care mi-a putut-o imputa Ilie Rad a fost faptul ca nu am scris bibliografia cu font-ul Italic, drept pentru care el si acolita sa Muresan mi-au scazut 1 punct din nota, obtinand astfel 9,33, au fost publicate pe internet o parte din emailurile distinsului dino… aaaaa, sef de catedra de la jurnalism:

http://scanteia.blogspot.ro/2007/10/mailuri-ilie-rad-1.html

ceea ce a facut iarasi deliciul presei:

http://ziuadecj.realitatea.net/eveniment/ilie-rad-caz-penal–43287.html

http://old.clujeanul.ro/cotidian/articol/Cluj/O_noua_scanteie_la_Jurnalism.html

Printre altele, a aparut si mesajul meu postat pe grupul de discutii al anului, care, cu toate ca mi l-am asumat, un „binevoitor” anonim (cam asa sunt toti lasii si pupincuristii din ziua de azi) s-a gandit ca nu ar strica sa il trimita lui Rad, cine stie, poate restul lingailor sai nu il vor informa la timp. Oricum, cu toate ca evenimentul s-a produs inainte de Licenta, ma indoiesc ca a schimbat cumva parerea acestui comunistoid despre mine 😛 Textul integral, nascut din scarba profunda fata de majoritatea colegilor mei de an si preocuparile acestora, mai jos:

From: „Anonymous Remailer (austria)” <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert

To: ilierad@yahoo.com
Subject: Balan Adrian va transmite
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:16:55 +0200 (CEST)

Un mesaj aparut pe grupul de jurnalism care cred ca v-ar interesa..

Un mesaj eeepic, din partea lui Balan Adrian, pt userii grupului.
Observatiile trimite-ti-le lui, nu mie.

„Probabil sunt singurul care nu are cont pe grupul acesta,
al „jurnalistilor” , nu ca nu as sti sa folosesc un calculator, dar
prioritatile mele in viata sunt altele decat robele S sau XXL si
camasile albe sau roz.

In 4 ani ne-am vazut la inceput destul de des, apoi din ce in ce mai
rar. Alte facultati, serviciu, prieteni, ore plictisitoare, multe au
aparut in viata fiecaruia. Ce a ramas insa neschimbat e regularitatea
cu care ne-am platit cuminti taxa, am stat in banca noastra
resemnati, o data, de doua ori, TOT timpul.

Nu ne putem compara cu cei din anii trecuti, care au fost uniti si si-
au cerut de la inceput drepturile (conditii de invatamant realmente
SUPERIOR) pentru care majoritatea dintre noi platim (sau o fac
parintii) bani grei.

Nu am fost si nici nu vreau sa fiu un al doilea Dohotaru, sa duc
razboaie mediatice cu Rad, Baba si Ubb-ul (suna ca un titlu de
poveste entitatile astea trei). Vreau insa sa fiu tratat corect,
serviciu contra serviciu sau servicii contra bani cum se practica in
economia de piata.

Nu o sa fiu lup moralist ca altii, sa ma arat revoltat din cale-
afara, iar cand sa rezolva problema sa ma retrag strafulgerat de un
ranjet tamp in coltisorul meu, sperand ca in ignoranta lor, prea
putini vor fi ocupati sa imi observe lasitatea. Ce e curios insa e
faptul ca sunt mai deranjat eu de ce se intampla decat cei in cauza
(prin voia divina a lui Dalesio am luat un 5), care propun resemnarea
bovina sau joaca rolul de agenti PR pentru facultate. Deh, oriunde o
sa fie la mare pret lingaii…

Stiu ca atunci, la primul incident Dalesio, impreuna cu Florin am
redactat acea petitie, am avut discutii cu CONDUCEREA si se parea ca
totul o sa fie bine, mai ales ca dupa ce a implementat sistemul
romanesc de rotunjire a notelor, o parte dintre noi, aia care au
iesit de la examen in acea vineri, au fost mantuiti de acelasi mesia
american care si-a vanturat odata bratul deasupra catalogului si s-a
facut lumina…

Ferice astfel de cei ce nu au mai trecut prin Valea Mortii
Restantelor, caci si-au intors spatele de la semenii lor si i-a durut
in proverbiala ga…a de suferinta celor ce le-au fost odata frati.
Banchete si robe si masuri si diplome si flori si discursuri marete
facura ei si se complacura in groaznica sodomie intelectuala si
savarsira multe pacate contra firii gramaticii, bunei-exprimari si
neatarnarii neamului.

Si pentru un timp a fost bine si multe clipe de desfrau traira ei pe
acest pamant pana in ziua judecatii de apoi. Ideea e ca s-a promis o
a doua Reexaminare tuturor pacatosilor (daca nu erau cateva sutimi
acolo patimeam si eu alaturi de ei) care sa le permita intrarea in
raiul licentelor, insa n-a fost sa fie.

Lasand la o parte alegoriile biblice, ciudat e faptul ca ordonanta
sau circulara vietii a rasarit din pamant, tocmai acum, dupa ce
restantierii au fost asigurati in repetate randuri ca problema
Dalesio va fi rezolvata. Mai ciudat e ca unii apara facultatea cu
dintii, avand probabil niste U si B-uri marcate cu fierul rosu pe
anumite parti ale corpului sau, cel mai probabil, incercand prin
slugarnicie utecista sa isi protejeze aceleasi parti ale fizionomiei
de MANIA celor DE SUS.

Cum spunea cineva, mai bine va resemnati cu totii, ca doar ce mai e
inca un compromis si inca un abuz inghitit fata de ce s-a intamplat
in 4 ani de zile? Nu cumva sa stricati sansele de licenta imaculata
(asemenea cailor neurale) ale unor viitoare secretare sau casierite
ce se viseaza Andreea Marin…

Nu vreau sa critic pe nimeni sau sa emit judecati de valoare ca doar
am destule defecte, dar nostalgia dupa vremurile si practicile PCR-
ului nu se numara printre ele. Poate parintii nostri ar fi stat cu
capul plecat, ca doar pentru aproape orice se facea puscarie la greu
pe vremea aia (intrebati-o pe Cese), insa ma ingrozeste atata
servilism ssi lipsa de coloana vertebrala din partea celei mai noi
generatii de „oameni mari, jurnalisti adevarati”.

Nu vreau sa fiu ipocrit si sa zic ca mi-ar pasa asa mult de viata
unora dintre voi, dar problema e ca boala asta de o aveti acum o sa o
raspanditi in orice ramura a vietii voastre viitoare si pana la urma,
dupa atatia ani de guvernari ESCU, nimic nu o sa se schimbe in
tarisoara noastra.
Oricum, bine ca sunt parintii mandrii de voi si o sa va puteti lauda
la toti cunoscutii ca ati facut o facultate! Amin!

Considerati asta un fel de insemnare in oracolul jurnalismului, ca
doara s-au discutat destule pe forum, asa ca ce mai conteaza niste
aberatii in plus. Cam asta ar fi raspunsul la intrebarea
oracolului „ce crezi despre cei 4 ani de facultate?”. Stergeti-ma,
injurati-ma, sau parati-ma, dar aveti grija sa nu va prinda doamna
diriginta ”

 

Evident, pentru tot ce am scris am dovezi, care sunt insa de prisos pentru oricine a avut cel mai mic contact cu institutia sau personajele mentionate de mine. Oricum, mai am muuuuuuuulte de zis despre FSPAC si jurnalism, insa o voi face cu alta ocazie. Take care!

2 păreri la “Facultatea de Jurnalism Cluj-Napoca (1)

  1. Pingback: Romania Libera online | De toate frate

  2. Pingback: Mass-media, slugi si stapani. Cazul Antena 3

Lasă un răspuns

Adresa ta de email nu va fi publicată. Câmpurile obligatorii sunt marcate cu *